One of the wheels I reinvent each August is this chart wherein I build the scope and sequence for my courses, identify the timelines as well as major formative and summative assessments, then list which EALRs/GLEs those assessments address so that I can be sure I've fulfilled my obligation. Sounds fun, eh? Yeah, I'm a fun guy.
As I posted recently, the State of Washington is shifting from the old standards for Language Arts (farewell EALRs and GLEs) to the new Common Core standards. Ultimately, I like the wording of these "new" standards better (and for some reason, I can just understand many of them better). There are changes, to be sure, but even within those changes I can easily see ways that "what I already do" could be tweaked a bit to fit that instructional goal.
This post, however, is my attempt to help illuminate the complexity within teaching that these standards illustrate. (I cannot even begin to imagine what this same post from an elementary teacher might look like!)
This year, for the first time ever, I will be teaching seniors. This year, for the first time ever (I think), the State of Washington will have English Language Arts standards for seniors. (Previously, we stopped having standards after grade 10. Hmm.) For fun…again, I'm a barrel of something for sure…I have listed below all the skills the mastery of I am to facilitate in my twelfth graders.
All that is listed below must be accopmlished during the 180(ish) 50-minute periods I have with these kids, give or take some for assemblies and visits from the Jostens rep. That's 150 hours. Or three-and-a-quarter work weeks of full time job not including the senioritis multiplier.
No sweat.
And now, without further ado about nothing: the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts at the 12th Grade. Or, as I like to call it: "My To Do List, Appendix A." For old time's sake, as you read each item, mentally preface it with "The student will be able to…"
(or just scroll down)
READING LITERATURE
Literature: Key Ideas and Details
1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
2. Determine two or more themes or central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to produce a complex account; provide an objective summary of the text.
3. Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
Literature: Craft and Structure
4. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including words with multiple meanings or language that is particularly fresh, engaging, or beautiful. (Include Shakespeare as well as other authors.)
5. Analyze how an author’s choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text (e.g., the choice of where to begin or end a story, the choice to provide a comedic or tragic resolution) contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
6. Analyze a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement).
Literature: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
8. (Not applicable to literature)
9. Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics.
Literature: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
10. By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 11–CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the rang; By the end of grade 12, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, at the high end of the grades 11–CCR text complexity band independently and proficiently.
READING INFORMATIONAL TEXT
Informational Text: Key Ideas and Details
1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
2. Determine two or more central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to provide a complex analysis; provide an objective summary of the text.
3. Analyze a complex set of ideas or sequence of events and explain how specific individuals, ideas, or events interact and develop over the course of the text.
Informational Text: Craft and Structure
4. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings; analyze how an author uses and refines the meaning of a key term or terms over the course of a text (e.g., how Madison defines faction in Federalist No. 10).
5. Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her exposition or argument, including whether the structure makes points clear, convincing, and engaging.
6. Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of the text.
Informational Text: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas
7. Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words in order to address a question or solve a problem.
8. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy (e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses).
9. Analyze seventeenth-, eighteenth-, and nineteenth-century foundational U.S. documents of historical and literary significance (including The Declaration of Independence, the Preamble to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address) for their themes, purposes, and rhetorical features.
Informational Text: Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity
10. By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 11–CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. By the end of grade 12, read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of the grades 11–CCR text complexity band independently and proficiently.
WRITING
Writing Standards: Text Types and Purposes
1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
1a. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
1b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
1c. Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims.
1d. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
1e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented.
2. Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
2a. Introduce a topic; organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.
2b. Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic.
2c. Use appropriate and varied transitions and syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.
2d. Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary, and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic.
2e. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
2f. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation presented (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).
3. Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
3a. Engage and orient the reader by setting out a problem, situation, or observation and its significance, establishing one or multiple point(s) of view, and introducing a narrator and/or characters; create a smooth progression of experiences or events.
3b. Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, reflection, and multiple plot lines, to develop experiences, events, and/or characters.
3c. Use a variety of techniques to sequence events so that they build on one another to create a coherent whole and build toward a particular tone and outcome (e.g., a sense of mystery, suspense, growth, or resolution).
3d. Use precise words and phrases, telling details, and sensory language to convey a vivid picture of the experiences, events, setting, and/or characters.
3e. Provide a conclusion that follows from and reflects on what is experienced, observed, or resolved over the course of the narrative.
Writing Standards: Production and Distribution of Writing
4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1–3 above.)
5. Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.
6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update individual or shared writing products in response to ongoing feedback, including new arguments or information.
Writing Standards: Research to Build and Present Knowledge
7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
8. Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.
9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
9a. Apply grades 11–12 Reading standards to literature (e.g., “Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics”).
9b. Apply grades 11–12 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., “Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning [e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court Case majority opinions and dissents] and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy [e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses]”).
Writing Standards: Range of Writing
10. Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.
LANGUAGE
Language: Conventions of Standard English
1. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
1a. Apply the understanding that usage is a matter of convention, can change over time, and is sometimes contested.
1b. Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g., Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage, Garner’s Modern American Usage) as needed.
2. Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.
2a. Observe hyphenation conventions.
2b. Spell correctly.
Language: Knowledge of Language
3. Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening.
3a. Vary syntax for effect, consulting references (e.g., Tufte’s Artful Sentences) for guidance as needed; apply an understanding of syntax to the study of complex texts when reading.
Language: Vocabulary Acquisition and Use
4. Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grades 11–12 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies.
4a. Use context (e.g., the overall meaning of a sentence, paragraph, or text; a word’s position or function in a sentence) as a clue to the meaning of a word or phrase.
4b. Identify and correctly use patterns of word changes that indicate different meanings or parts of speech (e.g., conceive, conception, conceivable).
4c. Consult general and specialized reference materials (e.g., dictionaries, glossaries, thesauruses), both print and digital, to find the pronunciation of a word or determine or clarify its precise meaning, its part of speech, its etymology, or its standard usage.
4d. Verify the preliminary determination of the meaning of a word or phrase (e.g., by checking the inferred meaning in context or in a dictionary).
5. Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings.
5a. Interpret figures of speech (e.g., hyperbole, paradox) in context and analyze their role in the text.
5b. Analyze nuances in the meaning of words with similar denotations.
6. Acquire and use accurately general academic and domain-specific words and phrases, sufficient for reading, writing, speaking, and listening at the college and career readiness level; demonstrate independence in gathering vocabulary knowledge when considering a word or phrase important to comprehension or expression.
SPEAKING AND LISTENING
Speaking and Listening: Comprehension and Collaboration
1. Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades 11–12 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
1a. Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well reasoned exchange of ideas.
1b. Work with peers to promote civil, democratic discussions and decision-making, set clear goals and deadlines, and establish individual roles as needed.
1c. Propel conversations by posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative perspectives.
1d. Respond thoughtfully to diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or complete the task.
2. Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data.
3. Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric, assessing the stance, premises, links among ideas, word choice, points of emphasis, and tone used.
Speaking and Listening: Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas
4. Present information, findings, and supporting evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization, development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal and informal tasks.
5. Make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest.
6. Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks, demonstrating a command of formal English when indicated or appropriate.
Phew.
Did you really read them all? Or did you just scroll down? No matter, chances are most readers won't do either. That's called "New Literacy."
Certainly there is some overlap, and certainly it is easily to accomplish more than one standard in a given task or assessment. It is not impossible. I actually find the standards useful for helping me focus my instruction.
Perhaps this list can serve as an indicator that it is not as simple as assigning a book and making the kids write a report or a paper about "How I Spent My Summer Vacation."
Those days are long gone… In fact, those days are so long gone that those days were the days back when the U.S. still ranked highest on international measures of educational achievement.
No, I'm not implying anything. See Literature Standard #6.
The math curriculum is common core ready. The literacy curriculum obviously wasn’t designed according to the common standards however there is a supplemental folder attached to the teachers guide that we should consult periodically to ensure the standards are met.
I also find this fact interesting- We are expected to teach the standards and students will be assessed on the standards. But not all the standards carry the same importance. “Observe hyphenation conventions” is probably less important than “Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.” However I have no idea which standards will appear on the MSP (state assessment) or what level of mastery is required to meet standard. I’m sure with some research I can get a clearer picture but those answers are not apparent.
Rob, that’s funny and sad that new standards don’t affect your professional life, because they cost someone somewhere a lot of money. Oh, wait, I pay taxes…they cost me a lot of money!
Was your curriculum designed to meet these “new and improved” standards?
Sometimes my head starts swirling that we’re in some surreal Dr. Doolittle world when it comes to public education. The kids are real. The paper and pencils and conversations in the classrooms are real. A lot of the rest of it seems like a crazy fun house dreamscape.
@ Kristen- How’s it going over there? Ahem. I’m an elementary teacher with packaged curriculum for literacy, math, science, social studies, social skills, and now academic enrichment. Each has its pace and sequence and if we keep pace we’re supposed to be able to get through it all. We’re told if we get through it all then the standards will take care of themselves (because somebody else made sure they align). Sadly the new standards make no difference in my professional life.
Did you know the assembly line revolutionized production?
I’ve taken a look at those standards too – although I have to say I made good use of my scroll function today.
Seattle has been blending Washington/Seattle/Common Core standards for awhile now, so it’s not a new thing for us thank goodness. Plus, we don’t have packaged curriculum like Bellevue does. I wonder how they’ll handle adjusting all of that to new standards? Bellevue teachers? How’s it going over there?
One thing I really like about these standards is that they’ve done what a lot of districts (okay, maybe only mine) haven’t done – look at what an exiting senior should know to be ready for the adult world and then track it backwards to kindergarten.
In my district there’s very little communication between elementary, middle and high school – and there should be a lot. The common core standards give us all the same map of where students should be at any mile marker, and I think that’s a good thing. It’s so good, it overrides the absurd amount of material we’re supposed to fit into 150 hours.
And let’s remember class sizes – 150 hours, but divided by 30 kids in a room we have 5 hours per child over a school year – that’s if there are no assemblies, ASB visitors with important Winter Ball Theme Surveys, counselors with scheduling pep talks, or whatever else always happens in an LA room because that’s where all the kids can be found. Talk about a barrel of something…
There is a separate section for reading and writing in Social Studies and other content areas…in most cases look just like the informational text and writing sections above, though a little watered down for the writing in content areas. To my knowledge, those have not been formally “adopted” by OSPI.
I do want to reiterate, though, that so much of this is “what we already do,” just articulated in typical English teacher over-verbosity. There are certainly ones that I don’t do enough of, necessarily, but there really aren’t any of those standards that I do not assess in one way or another. Many of them also represent skills which overlap– for example, there are a couple of standards that reference “selecting text evidence.” This is a universal reading skill that is simply repeated in two sections. To me, a good number of the reading standards are simply nuances of the essential skill of “drawing an inference.”
Do my kids achieve mastery? That’s the tougher question.
Why do all of them? Is English the only group responsible for the reading and writing standards?