Author Archives: Mark Gardner

Grading Parents?

By Mark

I doubt this will ever fly, but it sure makes for good staff lunchroom conversation.

A CNN.com article reported that Florida State Rep. Kelli Stargel has presented a bill wherein "public school teachers would be required to grade the parents of students in kindergarten through the third grade." The three grading criteria:

• A child should be at school on time, prepared to learn after a good night's sleep, and have eaten a meal.

• A child should have the homework done and prepared for examinations.

• There should be regular communication between the parent and teacher.

At first I thought it was a joke, and now I think that this bill is more a social statement than an actual attempt at creating the law.

What's your take? Below is the video that accompanied the article, sorry about the commercials which precede it. 

 

Substitutes

OXwgjO By Mark

I have a short list of people who I feel comfortable turning my classroom over to. Yes, I'm a bit of a control freak. People close to me would say that it is a manifestation of a form of professional arrogance, as if only a select few people have the capacity to fill these size 13s. Maybe there's a touch of that, but I like to think that it has more to do with the fact that I believe every minute of time I can offer my students is critical; so sacred that I lament any potentially lost minutes of instruction or practice.

So when I do have to be out of the classroom–which with three small kids at home (germ-factories) and a handful of teacher-leader obligations, tends to be more often than I'd like–there is no greater relief than seeing the names of a certain few substitute teachers appear next to my room key on the sub table in the main office. 

The job of a substitute teacher is harder, I think, than the job of a regular contract teacher.

Continue reading

The Locus of Control

Ladder
By Mark

I was flipping through an old notebook of mine and found a doodle I had drawn during a summer inservice after my very first year of teaching. Since the original had real people's names on it, I recreated that doodle here (click on it to see the text). As soon as I saw it in that notebook, I instantly remembered everything about the situation which prompted that drawing.

When I drew that, I was thinking of one kid in particular for whom I had attended several staffing meetings the previous year. At nearly all of these meetings were all the kid's teachers, her mom, an administrator, and a counselor. The child's social worker and parole officer had also been in touch with some of us. We were all strategizing with the kid about how she could be more successful in school.

What are your goals? Where do you see yourself after high school? What do you want in life to be happy?

Continue reading

Do One Thing (at least)

It is very easy to do nothing. I challenge you, if your inclination is to do nothing, to instead do one thing.

Not sure how to make your voice heard in this legislative session, considering that there are about two billion dollars (~$2,000,000,000.00, or 2×109 dollars) in proposed education cuts? You don't have to do everything, but every one of us ought to do at least one thing. Here are two easy ones:

1. Consider visiting the Washington Education Association Advocacy Headquarters website for ideas. There's even a super quick "click here to tell the Governor and your Legislators to protect our students" button that takes you to a quick and easy form that will guide you to make contact.

2. Set the tone for positive and productive discourse about education by expressing your voice to your local news. Again, WEA has a great portal to get you in touch. 

Seriously: they make it easy. So easy that not one of us has a good excuse to do nothing. Check out the setup at these links above.

Planning Ahead

By Mark

I was hired for my first teaching job when I was 23 years old. One of the first pieces of advice I received–which puzzled me–was to begin to plan immediately for retirement. More seasoned adults in my life were peppering me with questions like How much of my monthly salary was I willing to sock away? What was my personal savings plan? At what age did I want to retire?

Please, people!  I thought. I'm twenty-three. Retirement is thirty years away (if I'm lucky). Why do I need to be thinking that far into the future?

Continue reading

Cause and Effect: Time to Advocate

190155 By Mark

A lesson in cause and effect:

  1. The economy tanks.
  2. People lose jobs or feel cuts in pay.
  3. People are less likely to have an income they are willing to spend; there are fewer sales to tax.
  4. Less income means families wait to buy homes; the market floods and property values drop, taking property tax collections along for the ride.
  5. Total tax revenue for the state collapses.
  6. The inevitable cuts occur; schools are not spared.
  7. Teachers are RIF'd; support services are slashed.
  8. Class sizes skyrocket; materials cannot be replaced; technology stays broken.
  9. Students receive less attention.
  10. Questions go unanswered.
  11. Learning gets harder.
  12. Standards aren't met.
  13. Tests aren't passed.
  14. Schools are threatened: Perform or else.
  15. Since tests matter to the powers, whatever resources left are devoted to test prep.
  16. The arts, music, technology, skilled courses, PE, and vocational education dissolve.
  17. Learning becomes test-prep, not critical thinking or life-enrichment.
  18. Fewer students graduate; those who do can pass tests, but lack skills.
  19. Trained to pass tests, those new to the labor market are unable to find jobs.
  20. Businesses large and small suffer due to a lack of skilled or capable labor.
  21. The economy tanks.

Anyone else see it? I see a clear choice that our policymakers and legislators can make, on or around step six.

If we want to turn our economy around for the long run, how decisions are made at step six will make all the difference. If the pleas about children and learning don't work, maybe we need to talk economics.

Standards Based

Santa By Mark

'Tis the season when young'uns line up at the chair of the man with the beard and the big jiggly belly and ask gently and sweetly for a little something extra special.

That's right: there are six weeks left in the semester, so they're lining up at my desk asking for extra credit. 

I do have a beard, and a bit of a belly, but I'm afraid I cannot grant all these children's winter wishes. We have about four weeks left in the semester after they return from winter break, and a few kids are realizing that the grade they are destined to receive is more a lump of coal than a shiny new bicycle.

They beg to turn in that first essay, even though it is now ten weeks late and we've moved on. They plead to submit the vocab quiz from two units ago. The cajole me to create from scratch a whole new assignment so they can reclaim the points.

It is times like these, when kids are scraping together points, that I least like my job. I want them to treasure the learning, not seek to hoard meaningless points. I suppose this is why I am drawn to the bits and pieces I keep hearing about standards-based assessment. Perhaps this is just the next new fad I will be lamenting on this blog sometime down the road, and I have had a sort of love-hate relationship with the concept of standards. But if our goal is about the learning, not the accumulation of points, wouldn't a shift to standards-based assessment make sense? Wouldn't it make more sense (and be more meaningful) if my gradebook clearly showed the accomplishment of specific skills as opposed to the amassing of points?

Stop Digging

A6ryyv By Mark

I came across this Washington Post re-post via A 21st Century Union, a teacher blog rooted in Maryland. The piece in the Post, in a nutshell, illuminates a simple reality about the recent PISA education rankings wherein the US was situated far from the top. The maxim "if you find yourself in a hole, stop digging" forms the root of the argument.

The hole? The fact that the rest of the world is catapulting past American education on international measures.

What has dug this hole? Kevin Welner, author of the post, states it clearly: we are in the position we are in because the current generation of tested students came of age in an education system dominated by NCLB mandates centered on test-mania. We dug our hole with high stakes tests and an obsession with scores and sanctions.

The result of that test-mania is obvious: we have not gained ground in student achievement, we've lost ground. The proof is in the data. Since data analysis is all the rage in education, we should be abandoning what clearly doesn't work, right? Logic says we ought to stop digging.

Here's the link to the post, it is worth a read. I know I'm ready to put down this shovel.

Collaboration

By Mark

This video was emailed to me by a colleague…if you have a few minutes and are willing to maintain a sense of humor, it's worth a look:


 

Now, I wouldn't post this if I was just trying to be subversive or funny. In any satire or parody, there is always a kernel of truth (heck, sometimes a whole cob of truth). 

I truly enjoy authentic collaboration. In fact, I believe that my freedom to collaborate is actually what has kept me in education this long–if I were isolated in my own classroom all day with my only human contact being with 14-year-olds (who some contend are not quite yet human beings) I don't think I'd have lasted.

Because I get to collaborate and actually team-teach in my current assignment, I have grown as an educator and my satisfaction in my job has grown as well. There is something powerful about working closely with a like-minded educator or team of educators who share common philosophies, attitudes and dedication to increasing student learning. We challenge each other, support each other, and learn from each other. I am a better teacher because I have collaborated. My students perform better because I have collaborated.

Alas, like so many fads in education, Collaboration has become a four-letter-word to some, and I think it is in no small way due to the kinds of situations parodied in that YouTube video above.

Continue reading

Why I Teach

FqCgbp By Mark

November is a notoriously tough time for educators. The honeymoon of the first quarter has faded. Holidays, late starts and homecoming interrupt our best laid plans and the hacks and sneezes of the masses make the classroom sound more like an infirmary.

By now, the first few rounds of big projects and essays have left their treadmarks on my backside, and I've survived the first few rounds of angry parent phone calls and meetings as six- and nine-week grade reports have gone home.

In those gray clouds and cold winds there has to be a silver lining. If there weren't why else would we be in this job? 

A while back on the InterACT blog, Kelly Kovacic offered ninety seconds that summed up her reason for teaching, and it got me thinking about the reasons I teach as well.

I know that the right answer for why I teach does include something about making a difference in the lives of children or having the joy of watching the lightbulbs come on when they finally get it. It's also about the kind words and notes like the profound message Kelly writes about. For me, though, there's yet another dimension to why I teach. I work in a profession where every single day, I get to not only practice my favorite hobby but also help engage others in it as well.

Simply put, I get to think.

I've always loved thinking. I cannot imagine a world without it (though reality television might be a fair representation of such a world), and it boggles my mind that there are people who can ever just sit in silence and not think. I am always doing it. In the car, walking down the hallway, during staff meetings. The wheels are always turning, and my mind is always wrestling with something–sometimes profound, sometimes profoundly mundane. 

To me, teaching is thinking. As I present that lesson, I'm watching their faces–are they getting it? How can I tell? As I circulate during work time, I'm eavesdropping on the group a few desks away–what are they saying when they suspect I'm not listening? What are they learning? How are they thinking?

Sure, I am proud when my students make progress because of something I did or shared. Sure, it is nice to hear through the grapevine nice things that older students tell their younger sibs about how much they learned from me. But those ego strokes aren't enough to keep me coming back. Every day my mind is exercised, stretched, and challenged. I guess that's also called learning, since that exercising, stretching and challenging is exactly what I strive to get my students' minds to do as well.

No, I don't teach because I'm trying to save the world. That's just a happy by-product. I teach because I can imagine no more challenging mental avocation (for my tastes, at least). I teach because every minute of every day it makes me think.

In the pit of November, we all ought to take a moment to remind ourselves why we teach. And it's okay if, like mine, your reasons are as much about you as they are about your students.