
It’s technically a stupid question, with an answer that ends up eating itself. That’s because the tools we use to measure teachers are the same tools we use to measure schools: test scores. So a bad teacher, by definition, is a teacher whose students are getting low test scores, and a bad school is one with teachers whose students are getting bad test scores. Therefore, the good teachers will always be in the good schools, and vice-versa.
Technically, that is. But we all know that there are good and bad teachers who are good or bad independent of their students’ test scores. If that’s true (and it is) surely it would behoove us to work out a system where the best teachers work with the neediest children, right?


By Tom