There are reasonable concerns with implementing and holding teachers accountable for the Common Core Standards, but I'm still excited about them. They scaffold backward from where a student needs to be at graduation to what she needs to master in kindergarten, they elminate the crazy inconsistencies we had between the states before, and while they're a little wordy they leave a lot of room for academic creativity in serving the children sitting before each teacher. Before, our nation's academic standards were like a mall's food court – lots of different options, but few of them really good.
Living the Dream
On the last day of school, I gave my fourth graders an extra
recess for the first time all year. At one point, a girl walked up and said, “Mr.
White, what’s your dream?” We talk a lot about dreaming big and working hard to
catch those dreams. It was an interesting question.
I thought of all the dreams I once had: centerfielder, park
ranger, milkman, wide receiver, ophthalmologist, sail maker, ski bum. Those had
all come and gone, some more quickly than others.
Then I thought about some of my colleagues; people with whom
I had come into the teaching profession and many with whom I had gone through
National Board Certification. A lot of those people seem to have “risen up the ranks;” and moved into leadership positions as principals, administrators, instructional
coaches, and things of that ilk.
Then I thought of myself. Here I was, doing the same job I
started doing 29 years ago, and working at the same school for the last
twenty-five years. Was there something wrong with me? Am I not dreaming
anymore?
Actually, no. There’s nothing wrong with me. And I am still
dreaming. I have looked at other options within the education profession. If I
wanted to, I could become a principal, an administrator, a coach, or whatever.
But I don’t want to. I simply prefer to teach than to support those who teach.
Not that there’s anything wrong with those other people. I have nothing but
respect for those who choose to support those of us who teach. They are
important and necessary.
But they aren’t teaching, which is what I want to be doing.
Which is why I looked at that little girl right in the eyes and
answered, “My dream is to teach fourth grade in Lynnwood, Washington.”
“But you’re already doing that.”
Exactly.
Are Schools Really Failing?
Some "discourse" about all the failing seniors in Washington State wants us to believe (using Washington as a proxy) that schools are continuing to fail.
This Reuters article seems to suggest they aren't, at least in terms of "closing the achievement gap." (Here is the link to the source data.) In the Reuters digestion, though, one key passage stood out:
The only scores to stagnate were the overall averages for 17-year-olds. While black and Hispanic students improved quite dramatically, the overall averages for the age group barely budged in either reading or math.
Peggy Carr, a federal education analyst, said the flat trendline among older students was actually good news.
More 17-year-olds with shaky academic records are staying in school rather than dropping out, which makes them eligible to take the NAEP exams, she said.
Even though some groups showed significant gains, the overall average was the same. My math knowledge tells me that if gains happened somewhere and the average stayed the same, some group's performance decreased. That decrease is being explained as a change in the survey sample–kids who otherwise would have dropped out are now part of the pool. Makes sense. That might figure in to the "high" number of "failing" seniors on Washington State math assessments. In that first article linked above, Randy Dorn even alludes to the fact that a priority in schools today is to keep kids from dropping out: keeping them in the system longer. This is a good thing, but does have an affect on our "data."
So, wait a minute. Where else might this matter?
Who Gets to Design Curriculum?
Should curriculum be narrowed down until it is comfortable for each student? Seattle Public Schools recently required Race
and Justice curriculum taught in a senior class at the Center School to be suspended after a student felt “intimidated.” The teacher, Jon
Greenberg, was transferred to Hamilton Middle School after Center School students protested the course restrictions. While this has been discussed in my district as an issue of academic freedom, I see it as something even more important – as a parent, I see it as other parents deciding what my daughters can and cannot learn about in school, and that deeply concerns me.
Lessons in Teacher Leadership
David B. Cohen at InterACT (Accomplished California Teachers' blog) recently posted an interesting piece about the Teacher Leader Certification Academy in Riverside, California, which got me thinking about my own experience this past year in a newly formed "teacher leader" role in my district.
When I stepped into this role as "Teacher on Special Assignment," the job description was vague. Our district had not had a role like this at the secondary level, and as it was a part-time gig (two periods out of my day–with the other four periods consisting of my prep period and three periods with kids) neither I nor the leadership above me really knew what the work would look like in practice.
In the end, I learned so much this year. I learned things that I can apply in my own classroom, and of course I learned a thing or two about what it means to be this particular breed of "Teacher Leader."
The first thing I learned was to whom I should listen, and why.
NCTQ Teacher Prep Review
The National Council for Teacher Quality (NCTQ) just came
out with a review
of America’s education schools. And it’s caused quite a stir. I spent most of
the first day of my summer vacation sifting through it, and I’ve got several reactions.
But before I get there, a quick word about my own perspective: For the past
eight years, I have served on the Board of Examiners for the National Council
for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). In that capacity I visit two colleges
of education each year, collaborating on a standards-based report, which
eventually leads to the accreditation. (Or, in some cases, doesn’t) NCATE
accreditation isn’t universal; many states require it, although some states –
like Washington – let colleges decide whether or not they want to pursue it. Every
state, however, does have some form of standards-based accreditation for higher ed programs.
Now for the NCTQ review.
More on Airplanes: The Spin
It sounds like Tom has a budding pilot on his hands–and he's absolutely right that any good lesson, whether in the cockpit or the classroom, is going to have a lot of the same "pieces."
My boss forwarded me an article that took a different angle on the plane analogy. This connection, though, was not about teaching a young, intrepid pilot. Rather, it was about what happens when the plane goes out of control.
On page of 41 Bryan Goodwin's McREL 2010 publication "Changing the Odds for Student Success: What Matters Most," the author draws an example from the book Everyday Survival by Laurence Gonzales:
In the early days of aviation, the spin was a mysterious event, a death spiral from which pilots rarely recovered. Knowing that, a pilot who found himself in a spin would bail out if he happened to be blessed with a parachute. And then people began to notice something strange. After the pilot bailed out, the plane would sometimes right itself and fly on until it crashed or ran out of fuel. A clever pilot proposed this: the airplane wasn't at fault. The pilot was doing something to keep the airplane in the spin. Remove the pilot, and you solve the problem. Pilots began to learn how to recover from spins by doing less, not more.
The Perfect Lesson
My youngest son has expressed interest in pursuing a career
as a pilot. He turned 14 last month, so we gave him a flying lesson for his
birthday. The lesson was last Saturday and it was wonderful. But before I tell you
all about it, let me digress for a bit.
Thirty years ago, as I was starting my teaching career, the
big, new book that every teacher had to read was Madeline Hunter’s Mastery
Teaching. This was the dawn of Instructional Theory into Practice, better
known as ITIP. Hunter’s “innovation” was the seven-step lesson plan, which she
gleaned from studying thousands of effective teachers and analyzing what they
did. It was a no-nonsense approach to lesson planning and instruction, an
approach that’s worked for many of us to this day.
Let’s get back to the airfield. My son sat down with his
instructor. I forgot the guy’s name, but he started off by asking my son
whether he’d ever been in a small plane or not. “There it is,” I thought, “Pretesting;
he wants to know what my son already knows.” After that he pulled out a map of
the Seattle area. He took a toy plane and showed my son where we would be going
and exactly what he’d be doing in the plane. In other words, he was stating the
objective.
Then he pulled out a giant poster of a cockpit. He explained
the controls and some of the gauges and dials that would be important on this
trip. This was important, new information; otherwise known as input.
After that we went out to the plane, and the instructor led
my son through the pre-flight checklist and got us both buckled in and set up
with our two-way headphones. Then we took off.
At first they both had their hands on their steering wheels (actually
they’re called “yokes”) and the instructor helped correct my son’s attempts to
steer. But he gradually released control as my son gained confidence. It was a
textbook example of guided practice. After about thirty minutes, my son was
flying the plane himself; turning, going up and down, you name it. It was
awesome. It was independent practice.
The instructor took over for the landing. Apparently that’s
where it gets tricky. After we landed, he sat us down to go over the flight, celebrate
my son’s success and tell him what the next steps would be. It was closure.
Now I don’t know if flight instructors read Madeline Hunter
or not. I doubt it. But I do know that effective instruction is important to
them. It’s actually a matter of life and death. And when you get right down to it, good teaching is good teaching, whether it's in a classroom or an airplane.
The bottom line,
however, is whether or not the student learned something.
You be the judge:
The Post-Game Show: Three Things I learned this School Year
We're teachers. That means whether we end the school year battered and bruised, or triumphant and victorious, we generally don't have reporters following us around on the last day of school asking us about the highlights in student learning for the year. Replays of key moments in our classroom game are not usually publicly rebroadcast for analysis by a panel of color commentators.
Our post-game show is a little different. If we want to reflect on the school year, we're going to have to do it on our own. I checked out my schedule for the period immediately following the end of the school year: there's some professional development, a conference, and quite a few bargaining sessions. Other teachers have similar activities.
What's missing from this end of school line-up? Reflection. It really is. There is no time specifically pencilled in at any of my own particular meetings (as far as I know!) for looking back on the school year. That's interesting. I think the reflection is implicit–many of the meetings include check-ins, debriefs, annual reports, and the like–but explicit individual (or group) reflection is not generally an agenda item.
So how will I tell the story of my school year? Well–I don't want to forget about it–each year is remarkable. I've told several of those stories here on this blog, but a few of my stories from school this year are just going to have to remain at school 😉
Some things I learned this year, in no particular order:
What Purpose a Student?
The New York Times reports that New York will now include standardized tests in art, gym, foreign languages, kindergarten and first grade, and English Language Learning.
I suppose we all saw this coming. It's an unfortunate response to states being pushed to grade every teacher and the inequity of only some teachers teaching tested subjects. But a standardized test for art or gym? Really? A standardized test for kindergarteners? Really?
The single biggest problem with the direction testing is going is that instead of assessments being used to support student growth, which is how I use them, students are being asked to spend inordinate amounts of time supporting the measurement of their teachers. It's not about the kids, and it's not ethical.