By Mark

Unlike too many schools, we are in a position to hire. Last week, we interviewed candidates for two positions in my department–one replacing an irreplaceable veteran moving on to retirement, the other filling a new position resulting from enrollment growth. 

In total, we had over 70 applications submitted. 

We narrowed it to the interview pool, and each interview was impressive enough to warrant an offer. That's a good problem to have. 

In a break between candidates, my administrator, fellow humanities teacher and I started talking about how we would answer the questions we were posing to these candidates. We were asking them to deconstruct their lesson planning process, evaluate their own teaching, outline not only their management philosophy but also the practices that they find successful or challenging. We asked about standards, technology, collaboration, pedagogy, parent relationships, discipline…and more.

Obviously, when looking for a job a good candidate will expect to have to put all this on display. A well prepared candidate will have already anticipated this kind of scrutiny and be ready with details about his or her own practice.

And in the past, the reality has been that after the job interview, most teachers are never asked to do that depth of thinking about their own practice. Ever. Again. The interview was the gate, we said the magic words, and we passed through into our classrooms where we could shut the door and be the professionals we proposed ourselves to be in that interview.

Continue reading →

By Tom
White

It's over. My students have prepared for and taken the 2013 fourth
grade Measurement of Student Progress. It's now behind us. Let me offer a few
observations and reflections, based solely on my students' experiences:

-The adults seemed a lot more anxious and stressed out than the
students. Maybe it's because they were so well-prepared. Or maybe because their
evaluations aren't riding on the results. Or maybe it's because they're just
kids and they haven't learned to take everything seriously yet. Whatever the
reason, my students simply came in, sat down, listened to the directions, did
the work and read quietly until everyone was done.

-For some reason the narrative writing prompt was the same as one
of the released prompts from a few years ago. That was weird. In a good way, at
least for my students, since we used it as a practice exercise a few days
earlier. I'm not sure if the test writers goofed up or just ran out of ideas.

-Watching kids take an hour-long test is really boring. I'm used
to being incredibly busy for seven hours straight when I'm at work. Boredom is
something I only dream about, but when it finally came, it was horrible.

-I find it insulting that teachers aren't allowed to look at
student tests to see how they did. There's a lot of useful information in there.
I have no intention of changing any answers; I just want to see what the
answers are.

-While reading the directions for the math test, I noticed that it
listed protractors among the approved, supplemental materials. I stopped the
proceedings and sent someone down to the office to get a class set of
protractors. I didn't see anyone using their protractor for any constructive
purpose, and after the test, I asked my students if they actually needed them.
They didn't. Well played, OSPI; well played.

-And finally, this: Like most schools, we did everything we could
to maximize our students' testing performance. We rearranged schedules to
provide for long, uninterrupted blocks of time, we sent home letters to the
parents, asking them to make sure their kids got plenty of sleep, exercise and
nutritious food. We provided snacks during the tests, to make sure they weren't
hungry. We even ensured that there were no intercom or phone calls in the rooms
where kids were testing.

We did it all.

Which made me wonder: why don't we take learning as seriously as
we take testing? Why don't we make sure our kids are rested and well fed when
they're learning? Why don't we post signs on the doors saying, "Quiet!
Learning in progress!" Why don't we make sure kids aren't having recess
right outside the windows when we're teaching? And why don't we make sure
phones and intercoms don't interrupt our lessons?

I have no idea.

By Kristin

You don't have to have a lot of money to have a lot of sense about money.  Say your car is an older car.  If you have good financial sense, you take care of it.  You replace the brakes before you also need to replace the calipers because you know that will save you $500.  You take it into the shop at the first sign of malfunction, because you know that dealing with an early problem is cheaper than dealing with a big problem.  You make sure your tires have tread, because sliding on wet pavement and crashing is expensive.

People with poor money sense end up spending more because they're reluctant to spend.  They go from crisis to crisis, spending more than they can afford and more than they need to.  Our goverment at both the state and federal level is demonstrating a terrifying lack of money sense when it comes to early learning.

Continue reading →

By Tom White

For over half a century the Council of Chief State School
Officers (CCSO) has chosen a National Teacher of the Year from among the state
Teachers of the Year. After meeting the president and getting a large glass
apple, they get to spend the year traveling around the country representing the
teaching profession to large and small audiences.

It’s a huge honor. And even though there’s obviously no way
that anyone could select the very best teacher in the country, given the
enormity of the task, they always seem to find someone who really does
represent the best aspirations and qualities of all of us in the classroom.

This year, for the fourth time since the program started, a
Washington State teacher has been selected. Jeff Charbonneau, a science teacher
from Zillah, joins Andrea Peterson (2007), Johnnie T. Dennis (1970), and Elmon
S. Ousley (1963) as Washington recipients of the top honor.

And it couldn'y happen to a better guy. Jeff teaches chemistry in the same small,
Eastern Washington community from which he graduated, but he does a lot more than that. He designs
on-line college courses, teaches robotics, coaches the baseball team and runs
the drama program. He earned National Board Certification a few years ago and
is also his union’s co-president.

And you thought you were busy?

It’s always fun to see someone from the profession take
center stage for a while; reminding the world of just how unique and important this
profession is. And to have it happen to someone from our state makes it
especially gratifying.

Congratulations, Mr. Charbonneau! You do us proud.

By Mark

When some new idea surfaces in education, it gets acronymized. A general rule: if you want to make a project die, give it a clunky acronym. When the acronym makes a word, it can have subtle positive power (I think of CSTP which comes out as "See-Step"… I look, I move forward) or less subtle negative power (as in the HSPEs–"his pees"–with which everyone has to deal eventually, as opposed to the opposite pronoun which it is best to avoid.) With Common Core on the way the HSPE's expiration date is already set.

That rumination aside, the U.S. Department of Education has released details of its RESPECT initiative which is ostensibly aimed at cultivating teacher leadership, collaboration and potential in an effort to transform the profession and therefore schools themselves. RESPECT is an acronym/acrostic built of the phrases Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence, and Collaborative Teaching. Cute, a touch contrived, but that's only if you're cynical (which I apparently am, this Saturday morning before coffee).

Let's look at the meat of it. The opening line, "Every child in America deserves a high quality education…" reminded me of the "Don't you care about kids?" question I used to get when I'd vocally oppose our administration's newest trendy initiative. My cynicism started to wear off around page four, and by the end, my gears were turning. 

I see some potential in this. My interest is piqued but any gelling optimism is necessarily cautious. Take a read if you haven't already, (it looks like a 30 page .pdf, but skip the propaganda at the beginning and start around section II…the photos, citations and text boxes bulk up the pagination, so it is actually a fairly quick read).

What do you think? Like my students, I always learn more from the conversation.