Why I Teach: I Make a Difference

by Brian Mathtchr

This is inspired by Taylor Mali's poem What Teachers Make

For a long time I don't think I had a good explanation for why I teach.  I started teaching when I was already in my thirties.  I had done a lot of things, and I was working as a carpenter building a house in November in the Pacific Northwest when I decided I wanted to go back to school to get my teaching certificate.  If you've ever lifted a bundle of wet cedar shakes out of the mud and carried them up a ladder, only to repeat that action a hundred times, you'll understand why.

I remember meeting someone early in my career who asked what I did for a living.  I said "I'm a teacher now."  She said what do you mean now, and I explained that I had been many things and now I was a teacher.  It was what I did, not what I was.  I remember the odd look she gave me.

But as the years went by, and the first class that I had as freshmen graduated and went off to work or college I started to feel a change.  Every so often one of them would write me a note, or send me a card, thanking me for helping them in some small way.  Sometimes they came out of the blue, years later, describing some small but meaningful thing I had done; often a thing I had no memory of.

I've been here 27 years now, and I have kept all those notes.  When I get a little low I pull them out and read them again.  Some of them were written by students who are now the parents of my students.  When I see them at Back to School night, they tell me how glad they are that I am teaching their son or daughter.  Often neither one of us can remember exactly which subject I taught them, but there's a warmth.  We like each other.  I helped them grow up.

So now the answer to what I do is unequivocal:  I am a teacher.  I make a difference!

 

 

 

Why I Teach

Cp_red
By Tom

For me, it's the minutia. The trivia. The day-to-day cycle of planning, teaching, assessing and reflection. Doing it all day long. And doing it all over again the next day.

Take last Wednesday, for example. My third graders are learning how to count money. We started our math lesson by reviewing the value of each coin. Then I presented them with a page that listed the prices of a bunch of school supplies. They picked partners and took turns being the customer and the shopkeeper. The customer picked two items, the shopkeeper added up the prices, the customer counted out the cost using play money, and the shopkeeper checked their work. Both students recorded the whole process on their papers. Then they switched roles for the next round. It was a tricky lesson to teach. I had to model the process several times; enough to get them to see how it was done, but not so much that they'd grow bored, stop listening and not know how to do it. During the partner work I had to make another critical decision. At just the right time, I wanted to stop it to see what they could do on their own. It meant watching the clock and watching my students at the same time, ready to call them back to their own seats as soon as they seemed to get it and with just enough time before lunch for them to play a round by themselves.

That lesson went perfectly. I ended up with 27 kids knowing exactly how to count out bills and coins to make exact change. Of course, the last thing we need is a whole generation of shoppers holding the rest of us up at the checkstand while they count coins out from their little rubber coin purses.

For the sake of the rest of us, these people needed to know about making change.

That, then, was Thursday's lesson. The activity was similar, but this time the customer paid in bills only, and the shopkeeper had to count back the change. Counting on with change, however, is harder than counting up; you have to use pennnies first, to get to an "easy number," then nickels and dimes until you can start using quarters. While I was modeling the process, I got the impression that they weren't quite getting it. I decided we wouldn't go into the partner activity on Thursday; they just weren't ready. I made a decision to keep practicing as a whole class and stretching the lesson into a second day.

Good call. They got a little bored with Thursday's activity, but they were totally ready for the partner work on Friday. And when I called them back to their own seats to do a round of "counting on" by themselves, they all demonstrated mastery. I couldn't have been more pleased.

Those three lessons illustrate the complicated dance of teaching. Negotiating the variables of time, curriculum, pacing, and student engagement to maximize learning. It takes detailed planning, good curriculum, careful observation and experience.

It's not easy, and it to an outsider, it might not look very exciting, but when you get it right there's nothing else like it. It's the most fun thing in the world. It's about helping a group of children understand how to do something worthwhile. Effectively and efficiently.

That's teaching. And that's why I teach.

Why I Teach

FqCgbp By Mark

November is a notoriously tough time for educators. The honeymoon of the first quarter has faded. Holidays, late starts and homecoming interrupt our best laid plans and the hacks and sneezes of the masses make the classroom sound more like an infirmary.

By now, the first few rounds of big projects and essays have left their treadmarks on my backside, and I've survived the first few rounds of angry parent phone calls and meetings as six- and nine-week grade reports have gone home.

In those gray clouds and cold winds there has to be a silver lining. If there weren't why else would we be in this job? 

A while back on the InterACT blog, Kelly Kovacic offered ninety seconds that summed up her reason for teaching, and it got me thinking about the reasons I teach as well.

I know that the right answer for why I teach does include something about making a difference in the lives of children or having the joy of watching the lightbulbs come on when they finally get it. It's also about the kind words and notes like the profound message Kelly writes about. For me, though, there's yet another dimension to why I teach. I work in a profession where every single day, I get to not only practice my favorite hobby but also help engage others in it as well.

Simply put, I get to think.

I've always loved thinking. I cannot imagine a world without it (though reality television might be a fair representation of such a world), and it boggles my mind that there are people who can ever just sit in silence and not think. I am always doing it. In the car, walking down the hallway, during staff meetings. The wheels are always turning, and my mind is always wrestling with something–sometimes profound, sometimes profoundly mundane. 

To me, teaching is thinking. As I present that lesson, I'm watching their faces–are they getting it? How can I tell? As I circulate during work time, I'm eavesdropping on the group a few desks away–what are they saying when they suspect I'm not listening? What are they learning? How are they thinking?

Sure, I am proud when my students make progress because of something I did or shared. Sure, it is nice to hear through the grapevine nice things that older students tell their younger sibs about how much they learned from me. But those ego strokes aren't enough to keep me coming back. Every day my mind is exercised, stretched, and challenged. I guess that's also called learning, since that exercising, stretching and challenging is exactly what I strive to get my students' minds to do as well.

No, I don't teach because I'm trying to save the world. That's just a happy by-product. I teach because I can imagine no more challenging mental avocation (for my tastes, at least). I teach because every minute of every day it makes me think.

In the pit of November, we all ought to take a moment to remind ourselves why we teach. And it's okay if, like mine, your reasons are as much about you as they are about your students.

Let’s Blame the Middle School

by Brian Pointing-the-blame

Jay Mathews recently wondered if one of the reasons our students do so poorly on high stakes tests in math is because of a poor education in middle school.  I taught math in our middle school for 10 years before returning to our high school, and I have been hesitant to play a blame game with my colleagues.  I think they work just as hard as I do, and in my district I think the teachers are highly qualified. But I think Mathews may be on to something.

He points out that even though the middle school students are required to take state exams there are really no consequences for poor performance.  The 8th grade students who do not meet standard on their math test still end up in my Algebra class the next year.  If we're serious about this accountability issue why start with high school graduation?  Why not tell them they have to stay in 8th grade until they meet standard on the math test?

Or for that matter, why even let them in to the middle school until they are proficient at 5th grade math?  A student can stay in the public school system until they are 21, so what's the hurry?  It's pretty clear that social promotion isn't working in the era of high stakes tests, so let's make them repeat the grade if they don't pass the test.

So I'm with Mathews on blaming the Middle School, but not for the same reason.  Teachers at the middle school level deal with the same issues we all do with regard to student motivation and parental support.  But if I keep getting students who don't have the skills necessary to learn Algebra, then I am going to start blaming the practice of social promotion. 

 

Complete Stranger, Part 3

IMG_0257  
By Tom

I've been back from Pakistan for almost a week now, and as I reflect on some of the differences between us and them, I keep thinking back to a conversation I had with a guy I met outside a conference room. He had these cool shoes on, but they didn't look comfortable.

"I like your shoes," I said, "Are they comfortable?"

"No, they aren't; not after the first hour."

"That's kinda what I thought, just by looking at them."

Then he took the conversation up a notch. "I heard you speak during the panel discussion this morning, and I've got a question about America."

Uh-oh.

"How did you make it across the gap?"

I wasn't really sure which gap he was talking about, but after a few minutes I learned that he was a medical doctor, interested in education and he was talking about the gap between a largely illiterate nation where teachers don't make a living wage and a country where everyone can go to school and where the teachers are well-paid professionals.

This went well beyond conference-hallway small-talk, but I hung in there.

Continue reading

“Jersey Shore” is not real.

Images

No, I'm not kidding. It isn't real. Those people auditioned, were hired, relocated into that gaudy house, and then filmed. The episodes aren't real, either… No, I'm not kidding. Those episodes are edited together based on a storyline the writers create by putting The Situation and his crew into situations where the writers know how they will react. It isn't "real."

It is amazing how much convincing it has taken to prove to my freshmen that the Jersey Shore is not real. These are the same kids who have no problem suspending disbelief long enough to just accept that Peter Parker can climb walls when he wears the right spandex suit but who cannot just accept that the animals on Animal Farm speak English and build a windmill.

These conversations help to illustrate a critical shift which ought to be happening in literacy instruction in American schools: rather than studying literary works, we need to be studying literary processes.

  • We need to study the process by which 360 hours of Jersey Shore footage gets edited down to 44 minutes for a one-hour weekly episode.
  • More importantly, we need to understand the process of acculturation and normalization which occurs in a viewer when they watch entertainment labeled as reality.
  • We need to study the process by which lighting, angle, score and juxtaposition are used by news organizations to communicate a message beyond the news.
  • More importantly, we need to study the subtle and not-so-subtle biases which shape the decision-making about what makes air and what doesn't.
  • We need to help young readers learn to discern which sources on the internet are valid and which are not, and even what we mean by "valid."

Are these lessons more or less important than Shakespeare or great novels and poetry?

As with the television news, whose producers must pare hours upon hours of worthy news into 20-22 minutes of air time (including sports and weather), when we must choose what literacy lessons to keep and what to cull for our limited amount of instructional time, on what should we base that decision?

 

Complete Stranger, Part 2

By Tom

I’ve been in Pakistan now for almost a week, conducting workshops and attending an international education conference. The conference was hosted by Beaconhouse Schools, a private school system based in Lahore that has branches all over Pakistan, as well as several other countries. In the past week I’ve learned an amazing amount about Pakistan in general and their education system in particular:

  •  There is no pre-service teacher training in Pakistan. None. You learn it all on the job. Nobody goes to college to become trained as a teacher. In fact, teachers may or may not have gone to college. Most likely, they’ve only been through high school.
  • You cannot support a family on a teacher’s salary in Pakistan, which is about $75-$100 per month. If you’re a teacher in Pakistan, you’re a woman who’s either married to a guy who makes good money, or you’re living at home with your parents.
  • Unless you teach in a high school. High school teachers make a living wage. But there aren’t very many of them, because there aren’t a whole lot of high school students.
  • There are basically two school systems in Pakistan. There’s the private system, which is fairly progressive, or at least heading in that direction, and the public system, which is apparently vastly inferior.
  • The public school system is not free. It doesn’t cost much, maybe five bucks a month, but it is prohibitively expensive for a lot of people. Either 5% or 30% of the children go to private schools, depending on who you talk to and the point that they’re trying to make.
  • There’s also the Madrassa school system, which nobody likes to talk about.
  • Only about 40% of Pakistan’s children actually go to school. Forty percent. It might be twice that high in the bigger cities, but Pakistan is primarily a rural country.
  • I met a guy named Muhammad Ayub. He started a school in Islamabad. He teaches at night, after work, during his free time. He was sick of watching kids with nothing else to do, digging through the garbage, trying to help their families survive. His school has no buildings, no desks, no chairs, and no books. It’s a teacher standing in front of a bunch of kids who are sitting outside in the dark, on the ground, writing information onto notebooks. And they’re happy to be there. Some of them have gone on to college. When he spoke at the conference I started to cry. If you want to join me in donating some cash to this guy, his email address is muhammad_ayub13@yahoo.com.
  • The Prime minister also spoke at our conference. The attendees were polite and attentive, but they were primarily waiting to hear about the government’s support for education. Nobody cried.
  • Writing bulleted lists is a lot easier than real writing; you don’t have to worry about connecting ideas with transitions.
  • Teachers complain about the same things in Pakistan as they do in the US: The kids don’t pay attention, the curriculum is too prescriptive, the curriculum isn’t prescriptive enough, there’s not enough time for collaboration and there’s too much time spent collaborating.
  • The biggest concern among the teachers at this conference was finding a balance between accountability and a teacher’s freedom and responsibility to teach lessons that are meaningful to his or her specific students. Hmm.
  • The food in Pakistan is delicious. Absolutely delicious. Imagine Indian food, only better and slightly spicier. My favorite was the goat brain stew. Be careful, though, because it doesn’t taste nearly as good on the way back up. Trust me.
  • The traffic in Lahore is unreal. It consists of cars, trucks, three-wheeled taxis, bicycles, motorcycles and donkey carts engaged in a 50 MPH free-for-all. It literally took me several minutes to figure out which side of the street the traffic was supposed to be on. (It’s the left) I have never seen bolder driving. I actually saw a guy getting a ticket, and I can only imagine what he did to attract that kind of attention.
  • I have never worked so hard in my life. Before the conference even started, I spent three full days training 30 teacher leaders. During the conference, it got even more hectic: I presented a two hour session on brain-based learning, I hosted a two-hour discussion session on the future direction for the school system, and I was involved in three panel discussion, one of which I moderated. It was exhausting. But fun.
  • Pakistanis are the most beautiful, warm-hearted, hospitable and generous people I have ever met. They are appalled and sickened by the recent violence in their country.

Complete Stranger

By Tom

Last August, completely out of the blue, I received an invitation to speak at a conference in Pakistan. After I accepted the invitation, my hosts asked me to come a few days early to work with some of their trainers. Long story, short; here I am in Lahore, trying to figure out the cricket game on TV, after a long day of teacher training.

My session today was on different instructional theories; comparing the relative merits of empiricism, behaviorism, progressivism and constructivism. My audience – thirty teachers and administrators – all lined up on the side of constructivism. Constructivism is what they like and it's where they want to go. And apparently, Pakistan views the US as being a constructivist country. Student-centered and relaxed; a place where schools respond to students' natural pace of development. They think we don't rush our children, or force them to do academic tasks that they aren't cognitively or even physically able to do.

That's what they think.

I sadly disavowed them of that notion. America, I told them, used to be a place like that. We used to respect the children we teach and the place they were on the growth continuum. Not anymore. Now we try to cram as much learning as possible into their tiny minds, spending three months teaching what should have taken three years.

And why?

We're moving toward test-centered education. Not student-centered. At least at the systemic level. And why is that? Partly out of reaction to, and competition with, the education systems in other countries. America is racing to become Japan, Finland and Singapore. And Pakistan. Pakistan, meanwhile, is racing to become America. At least the America they thought they were racing towards when the race began.

In Pakistan they have teachers who are trying to tell parents that their children need to learn math at the concrete level before they memorize the times tables and division algorithms. In America we have math trainers preaching less manipulatives and more worksheets.

Weird. Maybe ten years from now, after their curriculum has become totally child-centered and ours totally test-driven, they'll like what they see in our country and we'll like what we see in theirs. And then maybe we'll invite some third grade teacher from Pakistan to come over here to tell us how to become what we used to be ten years ago.

And that poor guy will have to try to figure out baseball.

iPod Touch – A Jump Start in 21st Century Learning?

 

New-review-apple-ipod-touch-third-generation_large By Tracey

I apologize for my absence from the recent discussions, but I’ve been wholly and completely absorbed by two time-zapping projects.  Both of which I plan to blog about, and one I’m excited to launch in my classroom tomorrow. 

Over two years ago, I was one of many teachers across Washington lucky enough to receive a Peer Coaching grant from OSPI.  The grant included lots of training about being a peer coach to help others (and myself) integrate technology into classroom instruction, plus money to buy equipment.

Most grant recipients knew exactly how to spend their money and purchased hardware immediately.  I’m not much of a shopper.  I never know what to buy.  And since my school already had the big ticket items- a document camera, student response system, and an Airliner (a cheap alternative to the interactive white board)- we focused on learning how to use these.  We bought some Flip video cameras and rechargeable batteries, but most of the money stayed put.  Until, thanks to Mrs. Brown, the laptop cart-hogging sixth-grade teacher down the hall, I developed an expensive dream.  I wanted a class set of iPod Touches.

Continue reading

Building a Hybrid Virtual School

Qbqonw By Mark

A colleague of mine posed an interesting proposition lately. Like many school districts, mine is apparently toying with the idea of a hybrid virtual/brick-and-mortar kind of school-within-a-school. The idea is that the curriculum would be administered face-to-face when necessary and via web interface when necessary, so this colleague of mine was casting out a few lines to see if any of us would bite.

I've voiced interest in participating, but have concerns and questions. 

A few years ago, I was part of starting a small learning community "school-within-a-school" of sorts in my high school, and it is still operating, but that endeavor was small by comparison with what my colleague has in mind. I am wondering what models of this kind of hybrid exist, what are the benefits or shortcomings, and what the best course would be.

I'm definitely in the learning stages here. Sure, I can Google it or read some journal articles, but that only gives part of the story.

So, SFS readers and contributors: what do you know, or what advice do you have about building this kind of educational opportunity? If you are a brick-and-mortar teacher, what concerns would you have for a hybrid or virtual school? What hopes would you have?