On July 30, 2018, House Bill 1541 allowed OSPI to address equity in student discipline and close opportunity gaps in learning across Washington state.
As educators, we differentiate instruction for students who struggle academically or learn in a different manner. It makes sense that educators use the same process for regulating behavior, as discipline is not a one-size-fits-all model. The new format is a prevention-based approach, schools must attempt to correct behavior before requiring disciplinary action. Following this format ensures fair and equitable practices across the state for all students.
The changes to federal and state laws are this: 1) Limit the use of exclusionary discipline in schools. 2) Minimize the impact of exclusionary discipline on students who are excluded. 3) Reduce disparities in the administration of student discipline.
Many educators have a false perception of the new discipline laws simply because they aren’t well informed. I have heard many educators assume that the new rules mean two things. One, students perceived as “bad” can not be suspended for their behavior. And two, that those same “bad” students will be rewarded in hopes the rewards will change their behavior. This simply isn’t true.
OSPI’s Equity and Civil Rights Office officially advises schools to review the effectiveness of discipline and/or intervention strategies using a four-part model based on their school’s discipline data.
- Plan: Analyze the data and identify root causes
- Do: Decide on a plan and implement
- Study: Evaluate and monitor progress
- Act: Adjust your plan, if necessary
In reviewing discipline policies schools should adjust their discipline rules if data shows little or no progress in student behavior.
Continue reading